<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>this.rand() &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisrand.com/tag/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisrand.com</link>
	<description>the life of Ryan Meinzer and Jessica Meinzer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 01:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HTML Validation is (still) pointless!</title>
		<link>http://www.thisrand.com/2010/11/html-validation-is-still-pointless</link>
		<comments>http://www.thisrand.com/2010/11/html-validation-is-still-pointless#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xnuiem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geekdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisrand.com/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so we all know that we should write &#8220;valid&#8221;* HTML, and yet, less than 5% of websites validate for one reason or another.  Now this statistic can be a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so we all know that we <em>should</em> write &#8220;valid&#8221;* <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="HTML" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML">HTML</a>, and yet, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.netmag.co.uk/zine/latest-issue/issue-183" target="_blank">less than 5% of websites validate</a> for one reason or another.  Now this statistic can be a bit misleading as a comment from a user that didn&#8217;t use valid markup could invalidate the <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="Website" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website">website</a>, so granted, there is some play with the stats (per the usual), but let&#8217;s again assume that number is close.</p>
<p>Why?  Why do we not write perfect HTML?  Surely with the free <a target="_blank" href="http://validator.w3.org/" target="_blank">validator</a> on the authority&#8217;s website there is no excuse to write code that wont validate against the standard.</p>
<p>The answer there is simple, <strong>if and when </strong>all the major browsers (<a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="Mozilla Firefox" rel="geolocation" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=45.1238,-123.1138&amp;spn=1.0,1.0&amp;q=45.1238,-123.1138%20%28Mozilla%20Firefox%29&amp;t=h">Firefox</a>, <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="Safari (web browser)" rel="homepage" href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">Safari</a>, IE, <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="Opera Software" rel="homepage" href="http://www.opera.com">Opera</a>, Chrome) all render a page according to the standard, then I will finally start caring about the validation of my websites.  Until then, I will continue to write code that works across the board, and just not care if it is &#8220;valid&#8221;.</p>
<p>To be real though, most of the browsers work pretty well, however the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp" target="_blank">800lb gorilla</a> in the room, IE, does not.  <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="Microsoft" rel="homepage" href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a> continually changes the standards by which they will render a page, like promising <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/22/712830.aspx" target="_blank">CSS 2 support in IE7</a> then bailing on that promise 6 months before release.  And let us not forget the horribly pathetic Javascript <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="Layout engine" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Layout_engine">rendering engine</a>, <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="JScript" rel="homepage" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hbxc2t98%28VS.85%29.aspx">JScript</a>, that the rest of us just ignore because it can&#8217;t be trusted to behave reliably.</p>
<p>So, like even on this website, we find ourselves writing &#8220;valid&#8221; code, and at the same time having to redefine valid to mean &#8220;Code that works in all the browsers&#8221;, not &#8220;Code that the W3C says is valid even though it looks like crap in IE6&#8243;.  Just to maintain a semblance of order and sanity, we use the handy IE CSS hacks where IE on <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="Windows" rel="homepage" href="http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS">Windows</a> will actually arbitrarly execute code depending on the version of the IE browser being used.  Does that sound like an admission of guilt on the part of MS to anyone else?  OK Bill, repeat after me, &#8220;I know my browser sucks, so, instead of fixing it which would severely hamper my marketing and legal budgets, I will just allow hacks in order to ensure you nerdy web guys can still make pretty pages&#8221;.  There, was that so hard!?</p>
<p>So, someone feel free to run the validate against any of my websites.  Don&#8217;t bother sending me the results because I don&#8217;t care.  The sites work, the code looks good, documented, and is maintainable, so, what exactly was the complaint?</p>
<h5>*valid code is extremely subjective, but let&#8217;s assume here I mean W3C &#8220;valid&#8221; code.</h5>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2009/02/19/the-css-corner-using-filters-in-ie8.aspx">The CSS Corner: Using Filters In IE8</a> (blogs.msdn.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.inquisitr.com/17897/mozilla-should-be-thanking-microsoft-for-bundling-ie-not-kissing-eus-butt/">Mozilla should be thanking Microsoft for bundling IE not kissing EU&#8217;s butt</a> (inquisitr.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a target="_blank" href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.infoworld.com/article/09/01/16/browser-wars-deemed-hot-again_1.html&amp;a=2664880&amp;rid=688f04e7-7910-4d78-8153-78194999c6b9&amp;e=62bf56fb0808fa686789d7d6995fdf45">Browser wars deemed hot again</a> (infoworld.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/23/how-to-zoom-in-firefox/">How To Zoom In Firefox</a> (ghacks.net)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a target="_blank" href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.infoworld.com/article/09/01/23/Microsoft_to_deliver_first_IE8_release_candidate_Monday_1.html&amp;a=2800890&amp;rid=688f04e7-7910-4d78-8153-78194999c6b9&amp;e=32f3ce5da320127c5a388473cabdd420">Microsoft to deliver first IE8 release candidate Monday</a> (infoworld.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a target="_blank" href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.infoworld.com/article/08/12/19/Google_issues_first_postbeta_Chrome_update_1.html&amp;a=2330376&amp;rid=688f04e7-7910-4d78-8153-78194999c6b9&amp;e=0d13e5560c2070cb64992b4e6fce5c55">Google issues first post-beta Chrome update</a> (infoworld.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a target="_blank" href="http://thenextweb.com/2009/01/27/eu-force-microsoft-include-firefox-future-versions-windows/">The EU Could Force Microsoft to Include Firefox in Future of Versions of Windows</a> (thenextweb.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a target="_blank" class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/688f04e7-7910-4d78-8153-78194999c6b9/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=688f04e7-7910-4d78-8153-78194999c6b9" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thisrand.com%2F2010%2F11%2Fhtml-validation-is-still-pointless&amp;title=HTML%20Validation%20is%20%28still%29%20pointless%21" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.thisrand.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thisrand.com/2010/11/html-validation-is-still-pointless/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO…It really isn&#039;t hard</title>
		<link>http://www.thisrand.com/2010/10/seoit-really-isnt-hard</link>
		<comments>http://www.thisrand.com/2010/10/seoit-really-isnt-hard#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xnuiem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisrand.com/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization (SEO) really isnt a new concept although the buzzword is fairly new.  It is basically the process of ensuring your site has on it that which search...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization" target="_blank">Search Engine Optimization</a> (SEO) really isnt a new concept although the buzzword is fairly new.  It is basically the process of ensuring your site has on it that which <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="Web search engine" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_search_engine">search engines</a> (e.g. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>) index, hence making your search engine rankings higher and presumably driving more traffic to your website.  I still remember doing this in the mid-90&#8242;s when we had a huge number of search engines ranging from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hotbot.com" target="_blank">Hotbot</a> to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.altavista.com" target="_blank">Alta Vista</a> to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a> that mattered and each one needed to be submitted to and then your site massaged in order to get anything resembling a decent ranking.</p>
<p>Times have changed, the index bots are much more sophisticated than 10+ years ago, and are far less likely to be fooled by the tricks (like using keywords hidden in your background by using the same color for both).</p>
<p>I often get asked, &#8220;How can I improve my search results?&#8221;.  I usually try to resist rolling my eyes for two reasons: 1) the sheer amount of resources out there covering this topic are just overwhelming and 2) it isnt that hard!  So, to those hosting with me and everyone else reading this, here are a few short tips on how to get your site SEOized!</p>
<p><strong>Content, Content, Content</strong><br />
The more content you have, and I dont mean junk, I mean actual meaningful content, the higher your rank.  So sharpen your pencils and start writing.</p>
<p><strong>New Content, New Images, </strong><strong>New Stuff</strong><br />
Daily blog posts or news releases will really help you get noticed by the bots.  But again, dont post junk, otherwise your ranking will drop due to noone visiting.</p>
<p><strong>Network</strong><br />
You must network your site.  Join a few groups, post on them, use <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wordpress.org" target="_blank">WordPress</a> or <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hotscripts.com/PHP/Scripts_and_Programs/Blog/index.html" target="_blank">similar software</a>, embrace <a target="_blank" href="http://www.whatisrss.com/" target="_blank">RSS</a>, use <a target="_blank" href="http://www.myspace.com" target="_blank">MySpace</a> or <a target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a> and link to your site.  These will only drive traffic to your site, increase the relevancy of your keywords and get you the rankings you want.</p>
<p><strong>Use decent <a target="_blank" class="zem_slink" title="HTML" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML">HTML</a>/</strong><strong>CSS</strong><br />
I say decent, since I still think the entire validation thing is a scam (I will post more on that later).  Your page should work in all <a target="_blank" href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp" target="_blank">major browsers</a>, use <em></em><em></em><em>alt</em> tags in your images, name your pages something relevant, and avoid a lot of <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash" target="_blank">Flash</a> or Images (for now) since they still aren&#8217;t fully indexed.    Do not use an image for text blocks, it will not index!</p>
<p>See, not hard.  Enjoy adding quality content, dont overuse images or the other spiffy technologies (<a target="_blank" href="http://silverlight.net/" target="_blank">Silverlight</a>, Flash, etc&#8230;) and have fun watching your traffic come to you for a change.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a target="_blank" class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=7086a7c7-1b0b-446d-b55f-fcf728985424" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thisrand.com%2F2010%2F10%2Fseoit-really-isnt-hard&amp;title=SEO%E2%80%A6It%20really%20isn%26%23039%3Bt%20hard" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.thisrand.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thisrand.com/2010/10/seoit-really-isnt-hard/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if Google Had to Design For Google?</title>
		<link>http://www.thisrand.com/2007/10/what-if-google-had-to-design-for-google</link>
		<comments>http://www.thisrand.com/2007/10/what-if-google-had-to-design-for-google#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xnuiem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get so many questions about people wanting to make sure PHPX or any website for that matter is ready for the good rankings on the search engines. God forbid...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get so many questions about people wanting to make sure PHPX or any website for that matter is ready for the good rankings on the search engines.  God forbid it hurt the end-user experience, or make the site ugly, just as long as it gets good rankings on Google.  So, what if Google, the website, had to follow the same rules the rest of us have to just to get the good rankings on their own search engine&#8230;. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.meangene.com/google/design_for_google.html" target="_blank">Take a look!</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thisrand.com%2F2007%2F10%2Fwhat-if-google-had-to-design-for-google&amp;title=What%20if%20Google%20Had%20to%20Design%20For%20Google%3F" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://www.thisrand.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thisrand.com/2007/10/what-if-google-had-to-design-for-google/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

